RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, along with any other decorations, medals, badges and citations his unit may have been awarded. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the AFEM but it was never added to his DD Form 214. He provides copies of SPECIAL ORDER TR-0400 for OPERATION SOUTHERN WATCH in support of his application. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 26 May 99, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 7 Feb 01, his commander notified him he was recommending he be discharged for a pattern of misconduct prejudicial to good order and discipline per AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.50.2. On 14 Feb 01, his commander recommended he be given a general discharge. The commander noted the Article 15, Letters of Counseling and an Unfavorable Information File. On 20 Feb 01, the Staff Judge Advocate found the discharge legally sufficient and recommended a general discharge without probation or rehabilitation. On 26 Feb 01, the applicant received a general discharge with a narrative reason for separation as misconduct. He was credited with 1 year and 9 months of active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for award of the AFEM. Although the applicant served in Saudi Arabia in support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH, he received two LORs, a Memorandum for Record, two Records of Individual Counseling and a UIF; therefore, he does not meet the criteria of honorable service and is ineligible for award of the AFEM. DPSID was unable to verify eligibility for any additional awards for his active duty service. The AFEM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who after 1 Jul 58, participated in United States Military operations, United States operations in direct support of the United Nations, or United States operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations. Service members must be bona fide members of a unit engaged in the operation or meet one or more of the following criteria: be engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive days in the area of operations (or for the full period when an operation is less than 30 days duration) or 60 nonconsecutive days provided the support involved entering the area of eligibility, be engaged in actual combat, or duty that is equally as hazardous as combat duty, during the operation with armed opposition, regardless of time in the area, or participate as a regularly assigned crew member of an aircraft flying into, out of, within, or over the area in support of the military operations. The military service of the service member on whom qualification for the award of the AFEM is based shall have been honorable. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Mar 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. While we acknowledged the applicant’s request for the Air Force Expeditionary Medal, we do not believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice, as compared to others in his similar situation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03946 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Sep 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 2 Feb 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Mar 15.